Name: CHILLICOTHE ISD(099902)

Rating: Superior Achievement

Last Updated: 8/14/2006 5:04:25 PM

Indicators Answered YES: 20

Indicators Answered NO: 1

#

Indicator Description

Updated

Result

1

Was The Total Fund Balance Less Reserved Fund Balance Greater Than Zero In The General Fund?

6/24/2006 5:38:22 PM

Yes

2

Were There No Disclosures In The Annual Financial Report And/Or Other Sources Of Information Concerning Default On Bonded Indebtedness Obligations?

6/24/2006 5:38:22 PM

Yes

3

Was The Annual Financial Report Filed Within One Month After November 27th or January 28th Deadline Depending Upon The District's Fiscal Year End Date (June 30th or August 31st)?

6/24/2006 5:38:23 PM

Yes

4

Was There An Unqualified Opinion in Annual Financial Report?

6/24/2006 5:38:23 PM

Yes

5

Did The Annual Financial Report Not Disclose Any Instance(s) Of Material Weaknesses In Internal Controls?

6/24/2006 5:38:23 PM

Yes

6

Was The Percent Of Total Tax Collections (Including Delinquent) Greater Than 96%?

6/24/2006 5:38:23 PM

Yes

7

Did The Comparisons Of PEIMS Data To Like Information In Annual Financial Report Result In An Aggregate Variance Of Less Than 4 Percent Of Expenditures Per Fund Type (Data Quality Measure)?

6/24/2006 5:38:23 PM

Yes

8

Were Debt Related Expenditures (Net Of IFA And/Or EDA Allotment) < $770.00 Per Student? (If The District's Five-Year Percent Change In Students = Or > 2%, Or If Property Taxes Collected Per Penny Of Tax Effort > $100,000, Then Answer This Indicator Yes)

6/24/2006 5:38:24 PM

Yes

9

Was There No Disclosure In The Annual Audit Report Of Material Noncompliance?

6/24/2006 5:38:24 PM

Yes

10

Did The District Have Full Accreditation Status In Relation To Financial Management Practices? (e.g. No Master Or Monitor Assigned)

6/24/2006 5:38:24 PM

Yes

11

Was The Percent Of Operating Expenditures Expended For Instruction More Than 54%?

6/24/2006 5:38:24 PM

No

12

Was The Aggregate Of Budgeted Expenditures And Other Uses Less Than The Aggregate Of Total Revenues, Other Resources and Fund Balance In General Fund?

6/24/2006 5:38:24 PM

Yes

13

If The District's Aggregate Fund Balance In The General Fund And Capital Projects Fund Was Less Than Zero, Were Construction Projects Adequately Financed? (To Avoid Creating Or Adding To The Fund Balance Deficit Situation)

6/24/2006 5:38:25 PM

Yes

14

Was The Ratio Of Cash And Investments To Deferred Revenues (Excluding Amount Equal To Net Delinquent Taxes Receivables) In The General Fund = Or > 1:1? (If Deferred Revenues < Net Delinquent Taxes Receivable, Then Answer This Indicator Yes)

6/24/2006 5:38:25 PM

Yes

15

Was The Administrative Cost Ratio Less Than The Standard In State Law?

6/24/2006 5:38:25 PM

Yes

16

Was The Ratio Of Students To Teachers Within the Ranges Shown Below According To District Size?

6/24/2006 5:38:25 PM

Yes

17

Was The Ratio Of Students To Total Staff Within the Ranges Shown Below According To District Size?

6/24/2006 5:38:26 PM

Yes

18

Was The Total Fund Balance In The General Fund More Than 50% And Less Than 150% Of Optimum According To The Fund Balance And Cash Flow Calculation Worksheet In The Annual Financial Report?

6/24/2006 5:38:26 PM

Yes

19

Was The Decrease In Undesignated Unreserved Fund Balance < 20% Over Two Fiscal Years?(If 1.5 Times Optimum Fund Balance < Total Fund Balance In General Fund Or If Total Revenues > Operating Expenditures In The General Fund, Then Answer This Indicator Yes)

6/24/2006 5:38:26 PM

Yes

20

Was The Aggregate Total Of Cash And Investments In The General Fund More Than $0?

6/24/2006 5:38:26 PM

Yes

21

Were Investment Earnings In All Funds More Than $15 Per Student?

6/24/2006 5:38:27 PM

Yes

A.

Did The District Answer 'No' To Indicators 1, 2, Or 3?   OR   Did The District Answer 'No' To Both 4 and 5?   If So, The District’s Rating Is Substandard Achievement.

B.

Determine Rating By Applicable Range For The Number Of Indicators Answered 'No':

Superior Achievement

0-2

Above Standard Achievement

3-4

Standard Achievement

5-6

Substandard Achievement

7+ OR 'No' To Critical Indicator(s)

Indicator 16

Ranges for Ratios

Indicator 17

Ranges for Ratios

District Size - Number of Students Between

Low

High

District Size - Number of Students Between

Low

High

< 500

7

22

< 500

4

14

500-999

10

22

500-999

5.5

14

1000-4999

11.5

22

1000-4999

6

14

5000-9999

13

22

5000-9999

6.5

14

=> 10000

13.5

22

=> 10000

6.6

14